By Fred Nickols
The performance of an individual employee in an organizational setting has several aspects or dimensions to it. He or she wears many hats. In this month’s column we will examine seven of those performance hats.
To perform acceptably is to meet expectations, to comport ourselves in ways that are clearly acceptable, maybe admirable and perhaps exemplary. There is more to our performance than how much we produce or how well we do the work we are paid to do. Our performance includes our interactions with others and our impact on them, the example we set, the kinds of remarks we make, the sentiments we express, our responses to the unexpected and the challenging, our attitude toward authority and the way we exercise it, the way we treat others, and the way we respond to the ways others treat us.
As employees, we wear many hats and play many roles. In all cases there are expectations of us, of our behavior, and of our performance. Meeting or not meeting any of these expectations is reflected in judgments made about our overall performance. Consider the seven “performance hats” worn by employees indicated in the diagram below meant to be illustrative, not complete or comprehensive.
- Employee: This is the core, or most basic, role, and there are expectations regarding it. These typically include mundane things like complying with company policies and directives and showing up for work on time. It is our basic status as an employee, and it leads to additional roles and expectations of our performance in those roles.
- Worker: Our job or position has some specific technical tasks, duties, and responsibilities associated with it. This is what we are paid to do, and it is probably where the bulk of our time is spent and where most people focus when thinking about performance. But there is more, much more.
- Co-Worker: We work with other people, and our interactions with them, on or off task, are a key aspect of our performance.
- Team Member: We are likely members of one or more teams, either ongoing or time-bound. How well we perform as a team member is another key dimension of our performance.
- Team Leader: Being a team leader is separate from our technical specialty and again it factors in to our performance.
- Subordinate: Chances are we have a boss. Here, too, there are expectations that we must meet or exceed. Most of our interactions with our boss are probably related to our work, but there are interactions that are not directly work related and they carry their own expectations and requirements.
- Boss: Maybe we have people reporting to us and we are their boss. There are expectations of us as a boss, manager, or supervisor as well.
As the preceding roles suggest, we are not just producers of a particular type of result; we are also corporate citizens, members of the organization, and perhaps a member of one or more teams as well as a member of a particular unit. We have co-workers and colleagues, bosses and maybe subordinates, in which case we also have to manage, lead, and set an example. We have to respect authority and perhaps exercise it. There is much, much more to our performance than the specific results we are paid to produce in the course of doing the work of our technical specialty.
Clearly, performance can be narrowly or broadly defined. Define it too narrowly and it fails to address all that needs to be addressed. Define it too broadly and it loses its power to focus attention and achievement. A well-rounded view of performance and a multidimensional view of the performer are required to fully understand and appreciate performance in the workplace. We need a leader’s view of performance and performers, not just a manager’s or engineer’s or scientists’ or technologist’s view. Those who lead our organizations have little if any interest in a narrow, technical view of performance or performers. Consequently, we performance improvement specialists are well-served by having a robust view of performance in general and of human performance in particular. Whether as performance improvement professionals or as employees, we must tend to all the dimensions of performance, to all those “performance hats” employees wear, including the ones we wear.
About the Author
Fred Nickols, CPT, is a longtime member of ISPI and a frequent contributor to its publications. He is a writer, consultant, and managing partner of Distance Consulting LLC, a firm he founded in 2001. He served 20 years in the U.S. Navy; and since entering the private sector upon retiring from the Navy, he has held executive positions in small consulting firms and in large for-profit and nonprofit companies. More of Fred’s thinking and reflections can be found in the articles section of his website at www.skullworks.com. Follow Fred on LinkedIn and .